Digital Economy Bill 2016-17 | Intellectual Property Bill | Paris Smith Skip to content

28th April 2017

Digital Economy Bill 2016-17 and the Intellectual Property (Unjustified Threats) Bill receive Royal Assent

SHARE

28th April 2017

Digital Economy Bill 2016-17 and the Intellectual Property (Unjustified Threats) Bill receive Royal Assent


The 27 April 2017 saw both the Digital Economy Bill 2016-17 and the Intellectual Property (Unjustified Threats) Bill receive Royal Assent in the “wash-up” period prior to the formal dissolution of Parliament on 3 May 2017.

The Digital Economy Bill, as introduced, included a number of provisions which are relevant to the IP&IT and Media and Telecoms sectors:

  • In relation to IP&IT, the Bill includes provisions providing for the increase of the maximum penalties for online copyright infringement from two to ten years to match penalties for physical infringement; and for the repeal of the defence provided for in section 73 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 against copyright infringement for retransmissions by cable. The Bill also includes a clause amending section 24B of the Registered Designs Act 1949 to make it possible to give notice of registered design rights by marking products with a website address at which the details of the registration would be published.
    • In relation to Media & Telecoms, the Bill as introduced included measures to establish a law requiring age verification for commercial pornographic websites and applications. It also includes various provisions in relation to telecoms, such as a power to introduce a broadband universal service obligation, and a new Electronic Communications Code.

The Intellectual Property (Unjustified Threats) Bill extends to trade marks and designs the existing exception in patent cases (introduced in 2004) for threats made to a primary actor. It provides a “safe harbour” to allow a rights-holder to communicate with a secondary actor in certain circumstances by introducing the concept of “permitted communications”, meaning communications made for a permitted purpose and containing information necessary for the purpose. It also introduces a new provision preventing threats actions from being brought against professional advisers who act on instructions and who identify their client in the communication.

These are welcome changes indeed and will operate to ensure that trade mark owners (and their legal advisers) can in certain circumstances protect their trade mark rights without the fear of unjustified threats of litigation.

If you would like more information on either of the Digital Economy Bill or the Intellectual Property (unjustified Threats) Bill, please contact me, Partner of the Intellectual Property team.

Stay up to date with our latest industry news

By completing your details and submitting, you are consenting to us sending you relevant legal updates and invitations based on the areas of interest you select. For further details please read our privacy notice.