Divorce - When is it not about money? - Paris Smith Skip to content

23rd December 2014

Divorce – When is it not about money?

SHARE

23rd December 2014

Divorce – When is it not about money?


In the last few days, the High Court judgment in the Cooper-Hohn case has been published, setting out what is thought to be the highest award of money in any UK divorce. Jamie Cooper-Hohn was awarded $530 million of a total marital pot of $1.5 billion (which had been somewhat less at the time of separation).

Mr Hohn argued that the award should be $350 million, equivalent to one third of the assets at the point of separation. Mrs Cooper-Hohn sought a “full and equal share” of $750 million based on the assets at the date of trial.

Clearly a difference of $400 million warranted much complex legal argument during the proceedings, and at a lengthy final hearing, following which an enormous written judgment was produced, explaining how the concepts of (the husband’s) special contribution and accrual of assets after separation had justified a move away from an equal division in his favour.

If you think these numbers are impressive, consider that during their 17 year marriage, $4.5 billion had been transferred into a charitable foundation. This is altruistic generosity on a global scale – and is quite staggering. Between them, the Hohn’s built a leading world charity, The Children’s Investment Fund Foundation, addressing many issues, including child poverty, HIV/AIDS and climate change.

One thought overshadowed all others when I read the judgment. If the Hohn’s could selflessly give away $4.5 billion for good causes, why couldn’t they agree, even with the highest level of advice available, how to share the rest between them?

Stay up to date with our latest industry news

By completing your details and submitting, you are consenting to us sending you relevant legal updates and invitations based on the areas of interest you select. For further details please read our privacy notice.