Residential Property Disputes | Southampton | Winchester Skip to content

Residential Property Disputes

Protecting your most important asset requires expert help, whether it’s your home or your investment portfolio. When a dispute arises between neighbouring land owners over ownership or possession, rights of way, access, or even the wording on key documents, it’s important that you have a team with specialist help on hand to help you navigate your way through such a situation.

Contact our team


Arguments over a right of way or access, someone claiming land that does not belong to them on paper, or returning from a holiday to find your fence has been moved; are just some of the property and boundary disputes which can escalate into full blown litigation cases. Litigation cases can cost thousands of pounds and cause a huge amount of stress if not managed carefully by specialists.

Our aim is always to defuse disputes at an early stage and with the minimum of expense, typically at a mediation.

What we can help with

  • Boundary disputes
  • Ownership disagreements
  • Removal of squatters
  • Advice on issues caused by development works or extensions including party wall matters
  • Agricultural tenancies
  • Help with disputes over hedges, fences and other garden objects
  • Adverse possession claims
  • Agreements of previous owners
  • Assessments of land registry plans
  • Advice on title deeds, title register and title plan, so that you know what your rights are
  • Help with bringing a claim, mapping, witness testimony and background reports
  • Creating boundary agreements
  • Town and village green applications
  • Rights to light claims
  • Easement disputes

How we have helped clients

  • Obtained judgment in favour of our client who we had help counterclaim against a boundary dispute. Judgment finally awarded at trial with costs awarded in favour of our client.
  • Emergency injunction obtained to stop neighbour from installing fence along a shared driveway. Successfully applied to strike out the defence at the first case management hearing as it disclosed no real grounds for bringing or defending the claim. Costs awarded to our client.
  • Adverse possession claim for a large parcel of unregistered land that our client had occupied exclusively for over 20 years. Lengthy Tribunal proceedings ensued where various challenges by the executors of legal title’s estate over implied consent to be in occupation and whether client had been in exclusive occupation.
  • Settled disputes between family members where one party had contributed to the deposit of the property, maintenance or upkeep and no formal agreement had previously been reached as to how the property should be shared between them.
  • Multi-party right of way dispute which involved a land locked property in the Isle of Wight. Settlement reached at round table meeting between four sets of solicitors.
  • Urgent application to remove trespassers from a public green in Romsey and later a second area after the persons unknown sought to trespass again after first obtaining possession.
  • Settled right of way dispute without commencing proceedings between three sets of neighbours, two of which had built extensions over the right of way.
  • Resolved a complicated long-standing restrictive covenant dispute between the original builder of bungalows and their new owners who wanted to undertake (and in some cases had started) building works that breached the covenant.

How we work with you

Whilst based in the South of England, Paris Smith acts for businesses and families throughout the UK. Technology has enabled us to provide a high level of service to our clients whether they are local to our offices or not. Our advice can be given in many ways:

  • Over the telephone
  • Via video conferencing
  • In face to face meetings

We will talk through how you would like to be contacted and the best ways for us to meet in our early conversations with you.

Get in touch to speak with an expert.

Chambers Chambers Alternative

Introducing your key contacts

Nicola Davies

Partner – Head of Property Litigation Team

How we’ve helped our clients

“Lucy Taggart supported our recent boundary dispute with a neighbour. It was a challenging situation with strong opinions on both sides. Lucy helped us to navigate the legal process and it was very useful to have her advice and counsel at difficult times. Lucy certainly helped us to get to a point where we could come to an amicable agreement with our neighbour.”

S&G – Dispute with neighbour

“I worked with Lucy on a difficult dispute with a neighbour. She was consistently helpful, quick to respond, and clear with her detailed advice both when it was good news and bad. She was also constructively pragmatic, and pleasant at all times. Ultimately the matter was resolved satisfactorily without the expense of a court hearing. Overall, it was a very professional and highly satisfactory experience.”

Name withheld

“Nicola helped to lay out the appropriate steps we needed to take and guided us through these. She provided us with a detailed background of the case law surrounding our situation which helped us understand our position. This clarity helped give us the confidence to make the right decisions.”

1520 Management Company Ltd

“Circumstances led us to a legal dispute, which for us, was unfamiliar and frightening. From the start Rachel was a tonic. She avidly listened, scrutinised our position and then gave us options for our best route forward. She always met us where we were, which felt important. We felt confident in her commitment throughout working with her. In a few words Rachel is professional, diligent and friendly. We felt lucky to have worked with Rachel. ”

Name withheld

“Nicola Davies is personable with a sympathetic manner. She has good communication skills. She can identify the essential elements of a case and present them appropriately to other parties and, if necessary, to the court. Nicola is level-headed and persistent. With wide experience of legal proceedings, she knows how to adapt to changing circumstances. Altogether, she conveys confidence and competence.”

Private Client

“One source states “I have always found this team to be excellent not only in their advice to their clients but also their balanced view of the case. They are always quick to respond to queries and show a high level of patience in difficult situations.” Another adds “Paris Smith have an excellent knowledge of law relating to a variety of different fields. They are generally highly efficient and their staff are reachable and helpful.” A client says “They are extremely professional and go out of their way to keep you informed of case progression on an ongoing basis, without having to chase. You can always rely on them to deliver a good result, particularly Lucy Taggart in commercial property issues”; whilst other sources state the team are “extremely experienced in dispute resolution in property rental matters. Expert understanding of the relevant aspects of the legal system”; that they have “robust knowledge and experience in real estate matters”. Individual team members are praised with “David Eminton – very experienced and competent. Nicola Davies – very capable, good on landlord and tenant matters”; “Nicola Davies: excellent in all respects”; and “Lucy Taggart always keeps us up to date. Gives very good advice – very active and knowledgeable. An excellent solicitor. Highly recommend.”

Legal 500 Directory – 2023 Edition

“Referees say “David Eminton is an experienced litigator with a wide practice;” and “He is a knowledgeable, calm and supportive professional.” They also say “Nicola Davies is an able property lawyer with good overall awareness and a strong client care approach;” and “She is very experienced, highly competent and very personable.” ”

Chambers & Partners 2023 – Referee Comments

“Referees say ‘Nicola Davies did an excellent job of taking the time to understand our situation and position, laying out the options available to us and associated benefits and costs, guiding us through our decisions making process, providing detailed background on the case law surrounding our situation and providing additional clarity, and producing a high quality final product based on detailed research;’ ‘David is very competent and responsive, and an asset for Paris Smith and its clients;’ Other referees state ‘The team at Paris Smith are always highly efficient and provide a prompt response to any requests that I have for legal support and advice. The advice given is not only timely, but provides an appropriate balance of detail and succinctness and always includes pragmatic recommendations;’ ‘The litigation team has always provided commercial well considered advice. They keep a cool head in a pressured situation. They will act within very tight timescales if required and ensure that risk is minimised to the client;’ ‘David Eminton is a highly experienced but approachable individual. I would be confident that all bases are covered in the advice provided and the negotiations held on my behalf;’ and ‘Responsive and dedicated, no matter how tricky the task.’ ”

Legal 500 2022 Edition

“Paris Smith has developed a reputation in commercial and residential conveyancing, acting for clients across multiple sectors including investors, developers, business tenants and residential landlords. The team also has significant experience in representing developer clients in property contract disputes. David Eminton leads the practice and has increasingly been involved in high-value dilapidation claims, while Cliff Morris has particular expertise in boundary and right of way disputes and housing repossession claims. Clients say the team are “quick to respond, professional, have a good depth of knowledge“. Another states “the firms level of expertise is unique compared to other law firms, as there is always someone who can assist with any legal issue. Staff are also aware of their colleagues level of expertise and are able to refer matters to the correct person if they do not have a particular type of legal knowledge“, and another say they are a “high-quality technical disputes team, but local to its area. Mixes solidity of legal practitioners, good atmosphere, fine juniors and trainees and excellent contacts in the industry. The backroom is very good. Effective admin. Everything you need without going to London.”

Legal 500 Directory – 2021 Edition

“PS attended to our query and responded to our written communications promptly and clearly. They understood the issues facing us and were able to give the advice we needed in order to reassure us that we were complying with our obligations.”

C&L – Boundary Dispute

Chambers Top Ranked Logo 2024

Chambers and Partners Legal Directory 2024

What the team is known for

Paris Smith has a property litigation team that represents clients across a range of sectors, including retail, leisure and tourism. The firm is particularly experienced in dealing with contentious landlord and tenant issues, such as dilapidations, lease disputes and break options. In addition, the team also has expertise in dealing with complex boundary and right of way disputes.

“The firm has excellent knowledge and gives sound advice. It provides a solid client service.”

“Paris Smith offers excellent advice covering several complex leases.”

“The lawyers at Paris Smith are professional and know what they’re doing.”

Notable Practitioners

David Eminton

David Eminton is head of property litigation team at Paris Smith. He is particularly well regarded for his experience in issues such as dilapidations, developments, and landlord and tenant disputes.

“David is an excellent partner who is on the top of his game. He knows a great deal about property law.”

“David is very thorough when dealing with complex matters.”

“He takes the time to debate complex issues with me and then sets out clear advice on how next to proceed.”

“He’s very competent with sound commercial advice.”

Nicola Davies

Nicola Davies advises landlords and tenants on disputes affecting commercial and residential property including forfeiture and renewals, damages and adverse possession claims.

“Nicola is a very good solicitor. She is experienced, competent and efficient.”

“She’s a highly commended lawyer.”

Legal 500 Leading firm logo

Legal 500 Directory 2024 Edition

Headed by David Eminton, the Southampton-based property litigation practice at Paris Smith LLP is typically instructed by national retail companies, HNWIs, and charities to handle all aspects of contentious property matters. Nicola Davies is an expert on landlord and tenant disputes affecting commercial and residential property. Solicitor Lucy Taggart focuses on residential work for private individuals, while Lisa White deals with commercial lease renewals.

What clients say

“Nicola Davies is a very competent litigator.”

“Paris Smith have a very good reputation and knowing they were on our side, I felt we stood a good chance of a resolution and also it conveyed to the plaintiff we were serious. They have the resources to assist.”

“David Eminton- with 20 plus years as a solicitor under his wings, his experience and legal knowledge showed as we met with the opposing solicitors. As the meeting progressed, I felt I had the better legal mind and came out the other end with a good resolution.”

“Paris Smith handled the matter efficiently, closing it down quickly.”

“I was impressed by Lucy Taggart taking time to really understand the problem.”

“This is a stand-out property litigation team in the area offering strength in depth from top to bottom.”

“David Eminton and Nicola Davies in particular are consummate professionals, yet easy to deal with. They have a deep understanding of the law and the property litigation process and at the same time a very down to earth manner.”

Frequently asked questions

Below we answer some of the most frequently asked questions we receive regarding property and boundary disputes.

What causes boundary disputes?

A wide range of factors can contribute to a boundary dispute between two parties. These factors can be categorised as either legal/technical issues or personal issues.

The circumstances which give rise to a dispute are often identified as a result of investigation into property extent, following a trigger event for example:

  • changes in ownership of a property;
  • extension and improvements to a property;
  • repair or construction of boundary features such as fences;
  • replacement of boundary features such as hedges being replaced by fences;
  • change to the position of physical features over time, for example plant and tree growth which impacts on the boundary line.

Other circumstances which give rise to disputes can be caused by personal issues between parties, for example:

  • the change to boundary extent as detailed above (perceived as stealing land);
  • neighbour antipathy (jealousy, existing issues between the parties not directly related to the boundary at all);
  • greed – bullying of neighbours by owner or developers to gain extra land.

What constitutes legal/technical issues in boundary disputes?

Legal issues that can lead to boundary disputes include:

  • a lack of adequate evidence to confirm the physical location of the boundary, coupled with an unwillingness of the other party to accept assertions without this substantiation;
  • problems caused by changes in physical features;
  • a lack of clarity in the available documentation and consequential differences in interpretation or understanding of title deeds and plans;
  • different methods of mapping, such as Ordnance Survey maps which causes confusion with identifying the precise boundary;
  • badly prepared title deeds showing an inaccurate position for a boundary;
  • errors in conveyancing;
  • errors in Land Registry;
  • developers seeking to maximise plots; and
  • claims relating to adverse possession.

What constitutes personal issues in boundary disputes?

Often boundary disputes are complicated by the relationship between neighbours, such as the following:

  • Antipathy and jealousy on the part of an adjoining neighbour
  • Greed of the owner/developer to extend onto a neighbour’s land, by use of bullying tactics
  • An ongoing disagreement, unrelated to the boundary (i.e. noisy neighbours, pet issues etc), where boundary dispute is used as a weapon between neighbours

In personal disputes there is often a greater unwillingness to compromise or accept an adverse ruling, which leads to much more time and cost being expended (on appeals or enforcement proceedings for example) before a conclusion can be reached.
Many disputes are triggered by personal issues.

How can you resolve a boundary dispute?

Not all disputes develop beyond initial complaints or need legal advice. However if the dispute has a legal issue or cannot be resolved between the parties, legal recourse is likely to be necessary.

There are a number of possible ways of resolving any disputes that do escalate, for example:

  • Mediation – this may form part of formal litigation, but can be entered into voluntarily and be entirely unconnected with any litigation which may follow, should no resolution be found.
  • Arbitration or Expert determination – where advice is sought from experts in the field of boundary position.
  • Application to Land Registry – if both parties agree, the Land Registry can identify the position of a legal boundary and make it apparent from the register that the boundary has been determined. Should either party object to the application, Land Registry must refer the application to the Land Registration Division to be decided in a hearing by a tribunal judge. However, on a determined boundary application the Tribunal can only confirm that the boundary line contended for by the applicant is right or that it is wrong. For this reason, the process is rarely used these days.
  • Private negotiation or concession – talking informally to the neighbour which if successful will result in dispute resolution agreement out of court.
  • Litigation – This takes place either in the County Court or High Court (depending on value but usually County Courts). Litigation can commence prior to any discussions with the other party, or following unsuccessful dispute discussions (such as those detailed above).

Sometimes matters can be resolved and settlement reached after proceedings have begun but before the case comes to trial, thus avoiding very high costs and a bitterly contested dispute. However, where a dispute cannot be resolved cases will be decided by court judgment. Once beyond appeal, this judgment will be final.

Some disputes are resolved by one party or the other simply giving up. This may be due to lack of resources, or where the other party is significantly more “powerful” which can be intimidating and threatening.

Do I have to declare neighbour disputes when selling my property?

If you have been unlucky enough to have had a dispute with a difficult neighbour, then you are obliged to declare this on the Seller’s Property Information Form (or SPIF) which your solicitor will send to you to complete when selling the property.

If you do not disclose this dispute when you should have, you could be liable for damages to the value of the difference between the value of the property with the property dispute and the value without it. This can be a substantial sum.

What is a restrictive covenant?

A restrictive covenant is a contractual agreement, usually included in the deeds to property, which is imposed by the original landowner and stipulates the constraints of the sale regarding the usage of the land.
This covenant applies to the first and any subsequent owners of the land/property, until the covenant is released from the deeds. It is usually applied to land sales, where a portion of a larger piece of land is being sold. The covenant is applied in the deeds of the land which has been sold, to ensure the remaining adjoining land is not compromised by the current or future intentions for the use of the remaining land.

Can a neighbour enforce a restrictive covenant?

If that neighbour is the original landowner who drew up the covenant (or his successor), they can enforce the original contractual agreement made between the original contracting parties on subsequent owners of the land/property, as stipulated in the deeds.

Restrictive covenants may:

  • limit possible uses of the land, for example, the land can be used for residential purposes only;
  • prohibit particular trades or businesses being run from the property;
  • forbid undesirable activities or potential nuisances;
  • restrict the number or type of buildings that can be erected on the land;
  • restrict the size or height of any buildings; or
  • require observance of a building line.

Where the proposed use of land would breach a restrictive covenant, the affected property owner could consider:

  • negotiating its release with the beneficiaries of the covenant;
  • taking out indemnity insurance;
  • making an application to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) for the modification or discharge of the covenant; or
  • seeking a court declaration on whether, and how, the land is affected by the covenant, and its enforceability.

How to deal with neighbour disputes?

  • Informal negotiation with the disputing neighbour – The easiest way to resolve any neighbour dispute, is to try and resolve it informally by talking or writing to the neighbour to determine and discuss issues in order to reach agreement.
  • Mediation – If informal negotiations do not work, mediation is an option to consider. A trained, impartial mediator (available via a mediation service) will facilitate any discussions and hear both sides of the story. They can make a recommendation as to what should be done to resolve the dispute. Mediation will acquire a fee but if it is successful will negate the necessity to incur substantial costs by going to court or seeking legal advice.
  • Commencement of court proceedings. If all else fails it may be appropriate to seek legal advice and commence court proceedings. However, taking court action is very expensive and if you take your neighbour to court, it will ultimately damage your relationship with them.

What if my neighbour is a tenant?

If your neighbour is a tenant, it may be appropriate to discuss the dispute with the person who owns the property (the landlord).

If the dispute is unfounded, a private landlord has the right, should he deem it necessary or appropriate, to apply for repossession of the property from the tenant on the basis that the tenant has been a nuisance to neighbours.

Who pays for surveyor in a party wall dispute?

The Party Wall Act 1996 provides a dispute resolution procedure to not only give the rights to the builder of a property to carry out works, but to protect the interests of the adjoining property owner in the event of a party wall dispute.

A party wall surveyor will assess the works, paying particular attention to the disputed boundary wall issue. In order to resolve the issue, it may be necessary to grant a Party Wall Award to the adjoining property owner.

The surveyor’s costs cover the following assessments:

  • The rights of the building owner to carry out the works.
  • How and when the works are carried out and the time expected for the works to complete.
  • The access rights of the adjoining parties.
  • Any issues regarding the erection of scaffolding, if relevant to the build.
  • Any other matters incidental to the dispute.
  • The value of any Party Wall Award, if granted.

The building owner (as the person who is undertaking the building works) who has engaged the Party Wall surveyor will pay their costs and any award costs. However, if the proposed works includes an element of maintenance or repair to the party wall, which will benefit both parties, that element of the Party Wall Award costs may be divided fairly between the property owners, dependant on the build assessment, who caused any disrepair and who will benefit most from the repair.


How long does Land Registry take to transfer ownership?

From completion of a sale, it usually takes four to six weeks to complete the legal processes involved in registering the transfer of title to the new owner.

What is an easement?

An easement is a right benefiting a piece of land (known as the dominant tenement) that is enjoyed over land owned by a third party, often the neighbouring land (known as the servient tenement).

Can an easement be transferred?

An easement cannot be sold separately. It passes with the land when it is transferrred.

Can easement rights be taken away?

It is possible, although rare, to lose a right to an easement. An easement may be lost by one of the following ways:

  1. Abandonment – where it has not been used for a significant period of time and it can also be shown that the owner of the dominant land had a fixed intention not to use the easement in the future.
  2. Alteration of the dominant land – where the dominant land has been developed and the easement was only ever granted for a specific purpose.
  3. Unity of ownership – where the dominant and servient land is owned by the same party.
  4. Express deed of release agreed between the parties.

Who maintains a right of way easement?

If the right is created by deed then it should expressly state who is responsible for repair and or contribute towards the costs of repair. In the absence of any written terms, neither the dominant or the servient land owner have to maintain a right of way. The user of the easement does have the right to go on to the servient land and undertake necessary maintenance but not to make improvements.

Look You may also be interested in

Commercial Property Disputes
Conveyancing Solicitors
Inheritance, Wills, Trusts & Probate Disputes
Landlord & Tenant
Landlord and Tenant Disputes
Personal Injury Claims

Stay up to date with our latest industry news

By completing your details and submitting, you are consenting to us sending you relevant legal updates and invitations based on the areas of interest you select. For further details please read our privacy notice.